References

Bogaty P, Brophy J. Numbers needed to treat (needlessly?). Lancet. 2005; 365:(9467)1307-1308 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61025-2

Catalan A, Salazar de Pablo G, Vaquerizo Serrano J Annual Research Review: Prevention of psychosis in adolescents – systematic review and meta-analysis of advances in detection, prognosis and intervention. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021; 62:(5)657-673 https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13322

DeRosse P, Malhotra AK, Lencz T. Molecular genetics of the psychosis phenotype. Can J Psychiatry. 2012; 57:(7)446-453 https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371205700708

Fusar-Poli P, Cappucciati M, Borgwardt S Heterogeneity of Psychosis Risk Within Individuals at Clinical High Risk: A Meta-analytical Stratification. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016; 73:(2)113-120 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2324

Fusar-Poli P. The Clinical High-Risk State for Psychosis (CHR-P), Version II. Schizophr Bull. 2017; 43:(1)44-47 https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw158

Millan MJ, Andrieux A, Bartzokis G Altering the course of schizophrenia: progress and perspectives. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016; 15:(7)485-515 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.28

Owen MJ, Craddock N, Jablensky A. The genetic deconstruction of psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 2007; 33:(4)905-911 https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbm053

Radua J, Ramella-Cravaro V, Ioannidis JPA What causes psychosis? An umbrella review of risk and protective factors. World Psychiatry. 2018; 17:(1)49-66 https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20490

Solmi M, Radua J, Olivola M Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Mol Psychiatry. 2022; 27:281-295 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7

Thornton S. Mental Health: are we too quick to label?.: Headteacher Update; 2016

Wu Z, Liu Z, Zou Z Changes of psychotic-like experiences and their association with anxiety/depression among young adolescents before COVID-19 and after the lockdown in China. Schizophr Res. 2021; 237:40-46 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2021.08.020

Psychosis: Looking at recent research

02 June 2022
5 min read
Volume 3 · Issue 3

Abstract

Psychosis is a serious but complex and heterogeneous condition. Stephanie Thornton discusses recent research, including the staging system and early intervention.

Psychosis is possibly the most serious and debilitating of all clinical psychiatric disorders. This is a complex, heterogeneous condition. There are still many unanswered questions, including the aetiology of psychosis, the challenge of predicting who will and who won't develop psychosis, and the best means of intervention to reduce risk. What progress has research made, over the last few years?

We have long believed that having a first-degree relative (such as a parent or sibling) with psychosis raises an individual's risk of a similar diagnosis. However, the role of genes in triggering psychosis is presently controversial. On the one hand, complex genetic patterns that might mediate psychoses have been identified (Owen et al, 2007; DeRosse et al, 2012). On the other hand, surveys of research suggest that genetics are at best weak predictors of psychosis (Fusar-Poli et al, 2016; Catalan et al, 2021). Genetic and environmental factors may not be entirely independent, which complicates the debate. What is clear is that many with a family background of psychosis do not themselves develop the disorder, and that there are strong environmental factors shaping who does and who doesn't.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Journal of Child Health and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for children’s health professionals. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month